![reviews of purebasic reviews of purebasic](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41fNTvu3FgL._AC_US120_SCLZZZZZZZ__.jpg)
PB designed for Windows, Linux, Mac OS and Amiga OS development. Also, Delphi has long been used as malware creating tool - now few antiviruses suspects of Delphi EXEs in malware.
![reviews of purebasic reviews of purebasic](https://www.saashub.com/images/app/screenshots/10/55f041ca1ba5/landing-medium.jpg)
But they are paid (and very expensive) and creating quite large EXEs. You should learn and write a much more to obtain the same result.ĭelphi and C++ Builder aren't so hard. #include #include #include #include // #pragma comment(lib, "user32.lib") - for MessageBox, required if lib not added in the compiler options Tool for this should be quick, native and simply. And "temporary" soft writing for experiments with undocument libx, hacks, etc.And other soft requiring a performance and light weight.Adware and "legal adware" (with neccessary license agreement). Adware should eat a little CPU time, RAM and disk space and shouldn't require a third-party platform.
#REVIEWS OF PUREBASIC DRIVER#
Driver just will not work if will require a. Also very undesirable to require a few third-party DLLs weighing a few MBs at all. Installer shouldn't require a third-party platform. Where native and third-party independent development is necessary? I just help you orient that language is best for your purposes. Really.Īlso I am not a spammer advertising a commercial product on CodeProject. I do not work for the authors of PB. And, PureBasic is bes t for most native purposes. You can use Delphi, a few C++ implementations, and a few more PLs. Python and Java is better for cross-platform development, not least because not compiling to platform-dependent executable format on many OSes.īut, if you want write native applications, not requiring a third-party dlls and platforms, or native and cross-platform applications, you can't use C#, Java, Python. C# is more convenient and powerful than PB for writing Windows applications. I don't think that PureBasic better than all of these PLs. I writing in more than 10 PLs including C#, Java, C++ and other main-stream PLs.
#REVIEWS OF PUREBASIC ANDROID#
With that in mind, the book by Wyken Seagrave "B4A Rapid Android App Development Using Basic" is highly recommended.No. It takes a village to raise a competent programmer. To be honest, most developers are not educators and it takes a monumental effort to write or make video tutorials with the mindset of a beginner, especially smaller companies that are one-man shows or only a few developers. Of course, one can totally bypass the need for a console app by using the internal IDE debugger for interactive feedback. See here what it would look like to produce a similar console application in B4X. A simple input/output console-only program in QB64 would require only a few lines of code and will work in other variations of BASIC such as Liberty Basic, BBC with slight tweaks. So an interactive console-only application is not quite as interactive as say running a similar program in other languages. Knowledge of using the command line to run a JAR file is necessary as well to run console-only programs. The syntax can get quite complex compared to some other languages when creating console-only programs. Also since B4X is a wrapper for Java, it may take some knowledge of Java to learn B4X - for example when creating a console-only application. Some Programming Experience may be needed The getting started and basic language guides appear to assume some prior programming knowledge which may confuse the beginner programmer.